D…… a comprehensible. Although the movement to preserve historic buildings is not usually thought of as a comprehensible phenomenon, it deserves mention in the history of ideas because it launched the critique of the ideology of progress.
E…… a philanthropic. Although the movement to preserve historic buildings is not usually thought of as a philanthropic phenomenon, it deserves mention in the history of ideas because it launched the critique of the ideology of progress.
End skippable content
Indicate one answer choice.
Question 16.
Personal sacrifice without the promise of immediate gain is an anomaly in this era when a sense of BLANK is the most powerful predisposition shaping individual actions.
A…… fairness
B. . humanitarianism
C…… causality
D…… ambiguity
E…… entitlement
Begin skippable content
Answer Choices in Context:
A…… fairness. Personal sacrifice without the promise of immediate gain is an anomaly in this era when a sense of fairness is the most powerful predisposition shaping individual actions.
B. . humanitarianism. Personal sacrifice without the promise of immediate gain is an anomaly in this era when a sense of humanitarianism is the most powerful predisposition shaping individual actions.
C…… causality. Personal sacrifice without the promise of immediate gain is an anomaly in this era when a sense of causality is the most powerful predisposition shaping individual actions.
D…… ambiguity. Personal sacrifice without the promise of immediate gain is an anomaly in this era when a sense of ambiguity is the most powerful predisposition shaping individual actions.
E…… entitlement. Personal sacrifice without the promise of immediate gain is an anomaly in this era when a sense of entitlement is the most powerful predisposition shaping individual actions.
End skippable content
Indicate one answer choice.
Questions 17 through 19 are based on the following reading passage. Some of the questions based on this passage refer to specific sentences in the passage. The passage contains five sentences.
In Raisin in the Sun, Lorraine Hansberry does not reject integration or the economic and moral promise of the American dream; rather, she remains loyal to this dream while looking, realistically, at its incomplete realization. Once we recognize this dual vision, we can accept the play's ironic nuances as deliberate social commentaries by Hansberry rather than as the "unintentional" irony that Bigsby attributes to the work. Indeed, a curiously persistent refusal to credit Hansberry with a capacity for intentional irony has led some critics to interpret the play's thematic conflicts as mere confusion, contradiction, or eclecticism. Isaacs, for example, cannot easily reconcile Hansberry's intense concern for her race with her ideal of human reconciliation. But the play's complex view of Black self-esteem and human solidarity as compatible is no more "contradictory" than Du Bois's famous, well-considered ideal of ethnic self-awareness coexisting with human unity, or Fanon's emphasis on an ideal internationalism that also accommodates national identities and roles.